Topline
President Donald Trump has promised to cut a $5,000 check to every adult American citizen if his Republican party wins the majority of seats in the House and Senate this November—but the legally questionable vow is likely to become the latest Trump promise of cash stymied by fiscal math, legal barriers or congressional inaction.
President Donald Trump walks on stage on the first day of the 2026 Republican National Convention on Sept. 09, 2026 in Dallas, Texas.
Getty Images
Key Facts
Trump made the claim during an address at the GOP’s convention in Dallas Wednesday night, and likened issuing a “dividend” of $5,000 to Americans to a company making a “cash distribution to its shareholders.”
He didn’t provide any details on how the government would afford to pay Americans an estimated $1.3 trillion total, how the checks would be issued or how he’d get around federal laws that make it illegal to pay someone to vote, withhold their vote or vote a certain way.
The $5,000 payout is the fourth time this term the president has suggested his administration will give checks directly to Americans, and not a single one has ever been issued.
In early 2025, Trump and billionaire Elon Musk floated sending 20% of the cost-cutting savings from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) back to American taxpayers in the form of a $5,000 “DOGE dividend,” but no central pool of cash was ever created from which to distribute.
Late last year, Trump claimed federal revenues collected from new tariffs would fund $2,000 rebate checks for middle- and lower-income families, but fiscal models later showed the rebate would cost almost twice as much as the $240 billion generated by tariff collections and the administration didn’t actually have the money or authority to send out the checks.
And after allowing Affordable Care Act health insurance subsidies to expire—which hiked premiums for millions of people—the Trump administration backed a plan to issue direct rebates of $1,000 to $1,500 annually to citizens’ Health Savings Accounts, but the rebate idea went up in smoke after Congress failed to pass legislation re-appropriating the “savings.”
WHY IS IT SO HARD FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO SEND CHECKS TO AMERICANS?
Constitutional barriers and administrative logistics make it harder than it sounds. Article I, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution gives the ability to appropriate money directly to Congress—that power doesn’t lie with the president. No matter how much money sits in the U.S. Treasury, or how much revenue is brought in through tariffs or budget cuts, a President cannot legally order the Treasury to print or deposit checks. Money can only leave the federal government if both the House and Senate pass a specific bill explicitly authorizing the spending, and even “savings” from government efficiency or spending cuts can’t be repurposed into checks without a brand-new law passed by Congress. And even when Congress does authorize checks, like during the COVID-19 pandemic, delivering them is a challenge. The IRS and Treasury rely heavily on tax returns to know where to send the money, but millions of low-income Americans, retirees and young adults don’t file tax returns, leaving the government with no bank account information or mailing address on file. They’re also insanely expensive. While $1,000 doesn’t sound like a lot—it’s less than the average American family of four spends on groceries per month—to send checks of that amount to the roughly 260 million adults in the U.S. would cost $260 billion. That’s about how much the federal government spends on all federal food assistance and nutrition programs across the country per year.
IS THE $5,000 ‘TRUMP DIVIDEND’ LEGAL?
Maybe. Federal laws prohibit paying someone to influence how or if they vote, but Trump has framed his proposal as a promise that will be delivered upon after voting, as an economic incentive. Brown v. Hartlage, a unanimous Supreme Court decision from 1982, said candidates are allowed to make monetary promises in return for votes. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote in the court’s opinion that “so long as the hoped-for personal benefit is to be achieved through the normal processes of government, and not through some private arrangement, it has always been, and remains, a reputable basis upon which to cast one’s ballot.”
BIG NUMBER
$1.3 trillion. That’s how much it would cost to send 260 million adults $5,000 each.
WHAT EXACTLY DID TRUMP SAY ABOUT THE $5,000 PAYMENTS?
“If the Republicans win the House of Representatives and the United States Senate, both of them, because of our economic, tremendous economic success — in history we’ve never had anything like what’s happening — but because of our tremendous strength and success economically, I will issue a dividend to every adult citizen in the United States of America for $5,000… We don’t want you going to Canada to spend the money. We don’t want you going to China, to Germany. You got to spend the money in the United States of America… The reason the Democrats can’t do that is because they don’t do tariffs, they don’t take in money. All they know is poverty and how to ruin our country. But we’re making a fortune…So if the Republicans win, you win with us, and you get $5,000. It will be called the Trump Dividend. We’ll call it the Trump Dividend. Congratulations. Now all we have to do is win.”
Leave a comment