Kelly Clarkson performs during the 2023 Rockefeller Center Christmas tree lighting ceremony but her latest retail experience has been much less harmonious. (Photo by Arturo Holmes/Getty Images)
Getty Images
It feels like a long time since a tweet on X really put the cat among the pigeons, but Kelly Clarkson’s dispute with a small Brooklyn shop has become the latest reminder that social media loves nothing more than to escalate.
And while Clarkson is far from the first celebrity to fall out with a retailer or brand, her war of words with the shop has opened up a debate about the potential impact that well known faces can have when they share personal experiences.
The singer and former American Idol winner found herself in the public war of words with Art of Play, a curiosity shop in Brooklyn Heights over the weekend after an alleged disagreement with a member of staff over an animatronic bird.
The row began on Friday, Oct. 9 when Clarkson took to X to describe an encounter in store where she said she felt that a member of staff had looked down on her and assumed she could not afford what she wanted.
Her initial post was to the point: “Wow, dude. You’re an idiot and just lost a huge sale,” she wrote, before encouraging followers to visit the shop if they wanted to experience the treatment received by Julia Roberts’ character in Pretty Woman.
Art of Play responded on Instagram the following day, claiming that Clarkson had asked about ‘Molly’, a singing and dancing bird automaton permanently attached to the wall and used as part of the store’s magic shows, which was not for sale.
The statement acknowledged that Clarkson’s account of feeling judged would resonate with anyone who had experienced similar treatment but it also highlighted the consequences of attracting the attention of a major celebrity.
“Imagine our surprise when our small local business was suddenly attacked by 8 million people who have never visited our store,” the shop said, describing the experience as surreal.
Clarkson Bites Back Over Response
That did not placate Clarkson, who on Sunday carried the argument on across both X and Instagram Stories, disputing the shop’s explanation and sharing a photo that appeared to show a price tag beside the bird.
“Cool, cool. Sure, it wasn’t for sale. That’s the narrative Art of Play is gonna go with,” she wrote.
Clarkson said the employee had pointed out that the bird cost $15,000 and offered to find her something comparable, which she interpreted as condescending and accused the shop of being “rude” and a “liar”. She also rejected the suggestion that her intervention was an attack on small businesses, saying: “Your store is really cool. Unfortunately, you aren’t.”
How it began: Kelly Clarkson’s original tweet began a to and fro between her and the retailer.
X
The store subsequently issued a further explanation and said the original bird was not for sale, but its creator owned a nearly identical automaton that could be purchased for $15,000. Staff also claimed they had offered to show Clarkson another singing-bird automaton, made in Germany and priced at about $2,000, but that she had left before seeing it.
The exchange has already become a public relations event for both sides, with Clarkson’s original post attracting more than 39 million views, while the episode also prompted concerns about review bombing from people who had never visited the business.
Clarkson’s argument is that fame should not prevent her from speaking up about poor service, while others have pointed out that fame gives her criticism consequences.
When Celebs And Brands Fall Out
But Clarkson’s dispute is certainly not the first time a famous person’s words have created consequences that extend well beyond the original complaint. In February 2018, Kyle Jenner tweeted that she barely used Snapchat following a redesign of the app. The company’s shares subsequently fell sharply, wiping about $1.3 billion from its market value at one point, amid wider criticism of its redesign.
In February 2024, Snoop Dogg and Master P sued Walmart and cereal manufacturer Post Consumer Brands, alleging that the companies had conspired to undermine their Snoop Cereal business by keeping products in stockrooms rather than putting them on shelves, a claim disputed by the retailer and maker.
But the granddaddy of them all happened in October 2022, when Adidas terminated its lucrative Yeezy partnership with Kanye West following a series of antisemitic remarks by the rapper and designer. The financial consequences were substantial, with Adidas estimating an income hit of up to €250 million and left with a huge stockpile of Yeezy footwear.
Back to this weekend’s dispute and for Art of Play the most effective response was arguably to acknowledge the customer’s feelings while explaining the store’s position. For Clarkson, a point about the dangers of judging people has expanded into a debate about celebrity power.
Leave a comment