Home Top Stories ‘Neagley’ Is A Lot Better Than ‘Reacher’ And Needs A Season 2
Top Stories

‘Neagley’ Is A Lot Better Than ‘Reacher’ And Needs A Season 2

Share
‘Neagley’ Is A Lot Better Than ‘Reacher’ And Needs A Season 2
Share

I was perhaps unfairly skeptical that it was a good idea to make a Neagley spinoff of Reacher, which seemed like a somewhat cynical move to unnecessarily expand the universe just to keep things rolling between Reacher seasons. I was wrong.

Neagley is very good. Namely, because Maria Sten having her own show allows her to be more than just “Girl Reacher,” which is often how she came off in her Reacher appearances with limited screen time. And I am confident in saying that Neagley is a better show than Reacher, at least if we’re talking about the last few seasons (Reacher season 1 remains excellent).

Fans agree. Neagley season 1 is rated higher by audiences on both Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB than all Reacher seasons except the first. For some reason, critics continue to give insanely high scores to Reacher, like 98%s to seasons 2 and 3, though for Season 4, Neagley and Reacher are tied at 94%. Neagley is much better.

The difference is pretty clear, and based on two main factors:

Neagley herself is given a lot more dimension than Reacher. Reacher is mainly just tough guy who punches things and kills people. He’s strong, he’s actually very smart, but he is meant to be sort of an enigma. We learn little about his past, aside from brief glimpses of his MP days. He is upset when people he knows or even random innocent people are killed, but it’s just brushing against the surface of his character. I’m not saying this doesn’t work, but it’s a stark contrast to Neagley.



Source link

Share

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *