CARDIFF, WALES – AUGUST 16: Erling Haaland of Manchester City rues a missed opportunity during the 2026 FA Community Shield match between Arsenal and Manchester City at Principality Stadium on August 16, 2026 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo by Marc Atkins/Getty Images)
Getty Images
The soccer club Manchester City has just been found guilty by the English Premier League (EPL) of breaking several of its financial rules.
This follows a long process that was initially prompted by a document hack in 2018, and in 2023 by the club being officially charged by the league.
After more than two years of investigation, an independent commission working on behalf of the EPL concluded that across nine years up to and including the 2017–18 season, the Abu Dhabi-owned club arranged “sham” contracts and artificially inflated commercial/sponsorship revenues,
Furthermore, it decided that City had misstated its financial accounts, concealed the true state of the club’s finances from auditors and regulators, and made concerted efforts to frustrate and fail to fully co-operate with the Premier League’s investigation.
Now, the club, its fans, and observers of football in general await the next steps in the process, which have already begun with City officially appealing the EPL’s ruling.
If the ruling is upheld, the club could face a multitude of sanctions, ranging from fines and points deductions through to relegation from the EPL.
A case that’s set to run and run
However, such an outcome is still some way off, as club officials have firmly denied the charges against City and stated their absolute defiance and intention to defend themselves.
If the club’s appeal fails, it may seek legal recourse elsewhere, perhaps in the British courts.
As such, the case could go on for years; indeed, it is conceivable that a final, definitive ruling might not come until 20 years after City allegedly first infringed the EPL’s rules.
At the heart of the matter are the rules themselves and Manchester City’s ownership.
Amid concerns about sustainability and “financial doping”, the EPL instigated and has sought to tighten rules over time aimed at ensuring that clubs don’t continually spend beyond their means.
Moreover, the logic of its rules is that owners can’t illicitly use, for example, sponsorships to buy success or to stave off financial problems, thus ensuring that club owners and their managers must behave responsibly.
Arabian Gulf money, Arabian Gulf influence
One charge levelled by the EPL is that front-of-shirt sponsor Etihad paid inflated fees for its contract with City; according to critics, a matter given credence by the Abu Dhabi state owning both the club and the sponsor (in other words, simultaneously being the buyer and the seller).
That said, Sheikh Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan, a prominent billionaire royal and the Vice President and Deputy Prime Minister of the United Arab Emirates, has always claimed that his acquisition of Manchester was personal rather than state-backed.
This is neither an incidental detail nor simply a football matter, as the wider implications of the EPL’s ruling become apparent, with officials in the United Arab Emirates already making it clear that, if Manchester City is punished, the country will consider ending some of its investments in Britain.
Such a threat will have further exacerbated concerns about state influence in English football.
Britain’s economic woes
It is worth recalling that in 2008, as Sheikh Mansour was acquiring City, the global financial crash was about to hit, with significant victims including the British bank Barclays, which Abu Dhabi loaned approximately $6 billion in emergency funding through a combination of reserve shares and high-interest-yielding notes.
Since then, the UAE has invested around $40 billion in Britain, has become the latter’s biggest trade partner in the Middle East, and has been the third-largest recipient of UK arms export licenses globally since 2024, while British military deals there have been worth almost $1.3 billion in recent years.
Furthermore, post-Brexit, the respective governments are engaged in dialogue to reduce tariffs and ease cross-border business mobility, which is acutely important for Britain as it struggles to recover from the impact of leaving the European Union.
At the same time, Abu Dhabi has been central to Manchester’s renaissance and redevelopment as a city, largely achieved under the auspices of its former mayor, Andy Burnham, who has since become British prime minister.
Burnham actively courted money from Abu Dhabi and the UAE, often through his connections in Manchester; he’s a keen football fan and a traditionalist, though still with a keen appreciation of economic realities, geopolitics and international diplomacy.
British prime minister faces tough game ahead
As such, the Manchester City case puts him in an interesting position to navigate carefully, as incensed rival fans and cynical media observers maintain a laser-like focus on his decision-making.
The apparent power asymmetry between the UAE and Britain suggests they won’t get what they want, and that Burnham faces an early make-or-break test of his political judgement.
Whatever happens, for everyone expecting Manchester City to be relegated, they shouldn’t hold their breath; Britain’s parlous economic state, allied to its interdependencies in the Gulf, especially at this time of intense regional turbulence, means that the ultimate outcome of the case against City may not be what people expect or want.
Leave a comment